The Functional Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Gene I/D Polymorphism Does not Alter Susceptibility to Chronic Pancreatitis

Nevin Oruc1, Janette Lamb1, Onur Cagri Kutlu4, M Michael Barmada2, Mary E Money5, Adam Slivka1, David C Whitcomb1,2,3

1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, 2Human Genetics, 3Cell Biology and Physiology, and the Center for Genomic Sciences, University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

4GATA Medical School, General Surgery Department. Ankara, Turkey.

5Washington County Hospital. Hagerstown, MD, USA

*Corresponding Author:
David C Whitcomb
Division of Gastroenterology
Hepatology and Nutrition Mezz. Level, C Wing
UPMC Presbyterian 200 Lothrop
St. Pittsburgh, PA USA
Phone +1-412.648.9604
Fax +1-412.383.7236
E-mail [email protected]

Received July 14th, 2004 - Accepted September 7th, 2004

 
Visit for more related articles at JOP. Journal of the Pancreas

Abstract

Context :Alterations of the renin-angiotensin system have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases. The angiotensin converting enzyme is a key enzyme in the renin-angiotensin system. A deletion polymorphism of a 287-bp fragment of intron 16 of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene allele results in higher levels of circulating enzyme. ACE deletion genotype has been linked to heart diseases, sarcoidosis and liver fibrosis. The pancreatic reninangiotensin system plays a role in the development of pancreatic fibrosis and ACE inhibitors decrease pancreatic fibrosis in experimental models. Objectives :We investigated the frequency of the ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism in chronic pancreatitis patients and controls. Patients Subjects with familial pancreatit is (n=51), sporadic chronic pancreatitis (n=104), and healthy controls (n=163) were evaluated. Main outcome measure :The presence of ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism. Results :The frequency of the ACE gene deletion allele was similar in familial pancreatitis (49.0%) sporadic pancreatitis (51.0%) and controls (55.8%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in clinical features between patients with ACE-insertion or insertion/deletion genotypes vs. patientswith ACE-deletion genotype. Conclusion :We conclude that the ACE deletion genotype does not make a significant contribution to the pathogenesis and the progression of chronic pancreatitis.

Keywords

Pancreatitis; Polymorphism (Genetics); Renin-Angiotensin System

Abbreviations

ACE: angiotensin converting enzyme; HIPAA: the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; HP: hereditary pancreatitis; IRB: institutional review board; NAPS2: North American Pancreatitis Study 2; RAS: renin angiotensin system

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease which leads to pancreatic fibrosis and the destruction of the exocrine and the endocrine pancreas [1]. Pancreatitis appears to be a complex disorder reflecting the interaction of various genetic and environmental factors [2, 3]. However, the major common genetic risk factors have yet to be defined.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a circulatory cascade system primarily involved in the regulation of blood pressure and serum electrolytes [4, 5]. The key enzyme in this system is the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) which converts angiotensin I to the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II [4, 5, 6]. The RAS has been said to be involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases including fibrosis in the heart, kidney, lung and liver during chronic inflammation through the regulation of cell growth, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis [7, 8, 9, 10].

The ACE gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism was first identified in 1990 [11]. The ACE-D, a deletion polymorphism of a 287-bp fragment of intron 16 of the ACE gene allele, has been shown to result in higher levels of circulating enzyme in a dose dependent manner [11]. The role of the ACE gene I/D polymorphism as a risk factor has been investigated in several diseases. The ACE deletion (DD) genotype, for example, results in a 1.3 fold increased risk of myocardial infarction [12]. Recent studies have shown that the RAS is intrinsically present in the pancreas [13] and its genetic expression is enhanced during acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatic hypoxia in experimental animals [14, 15]. Furthermore, the pharmacological blockage of ACE significantly attenuated pancreatic fibrosis in an experimental model of chronic pancreatitis in rats [16]. Thus ACE may have a pathogenic role in the development of chronic pancreatitis. However, the prevalence of the ACE I/D polymorphism in chronic pancreatitis and its contribution to the course of the disease has not yet been defined. We therefore investigated the occurrence of the ACE I/D polymorphism in chronic pancreatitis patients and its relationship to the course of the disease.

METHODS

Patients

One hundred fifty five subjects were selected from the institutional review board (IRB) approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant, hereditary pancreatitis (HP) study and the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 (NAPS2) pilot study which included a patient group recruited through the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center clinics. Fifty-one cases had familial pancreatitis and 104 cases had sporadic chronic pancreatitis. In addition, 163 healthy controls were evaluated. The controls included spouses of affected individuals from both studies or communitybased controls over 50 years of age who had no prior history of digestive disease.

Data Recording

All subjects completed standardized questionnaires assessing family history, clinical history, environmental exposure (including alcohol consumption and smoking history) and detailed questions about recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis. The 155 patients selected also provided medical records which included clinical notes, operative notes, discharge summaries, laboratory reports, abdominal imaging reports and pathology reports that elucidated the pattern of the pancreatic disease. The patient information was used to categorize the pancreatitis according to the etiology of pancreatitis, the risk factors and the severity of the disease.

Laboratory Procedure

Genomic DNA was purified from peripheral blood cells of the subjects using a commercially available kit (Puregene DNA isolation kit, Gentra systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The ACE genotype was determined by PCR amplification of a genomic DNA fragment on intron 16 of the ACE gene as previously described by Rigat et al. [11]. The forward and reverse primers used were 5- CTGGAGACCACTCCCATCCTTTCT, and 5-GATGTGGCCATCACATTCGTCAGAT, respectively. Amplified ACE gene fragments without insertion (D allele) and with insertion (I allele) of approximate 190 and approximate 490 bp, respectively, were detected on 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. To increase the specificity of DD genotyping, PCR amplifications were performed with an insertion-specific primer pair (5- TGGGACCACAGCGCCCG CCACTAC and 5-TCGCCAGCCCTCCCATGCCCATAA), with 25 μL reactions (0.5 μg genomic DNA, 500 pmol of primers, 0.5 mM each deoxy- ATP, GTP, CTP, TTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase), with 1 min of denaturation at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 67°C, and 2 min at 72°C. The reaction yields no products in the samples of DD genotype [17]. Only the insertion (I) allele produces a 335-bp amplicon. The 335-bp fragment was identified on 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide.

ETHICS

The study was conducted with the approval of Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh. All patients and controls gave written informed consent,

STATISTICS

The results were given as mean±SD or allele frequencies. Data were analyzed by means of the logistic regression, the one- and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the hierarchical log-linear models. The odds ratios (OR) evaluated by the logistic regression together with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were also reported. Twotailed P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study was powered to detect a relative risk of 3 in the familial pancreatitis group of 88% and in the sporadic chronic pancreatitis group of 97% (http://calculators.stat.ucla.edu/powercalc/)

RESULTS

A group of 51 familial pancreatitis patients (39.1±18.2 years old; F/M: 38/13, 74.5%/25.5%), 104 sporadic chronic pancreatitis (42.7±17.8 years old; F/M: 58/46, 55.8%/44.2%) and 163 healthy controls (60.5±13.3 years old; F/M: 97/66, 59.5%/40.5%) were evaluated. The mean age in the healthy controls was significantly higher than in both the familial and the sporadic chronic pancreatitis patients (P<0.001), while no significant difference was observed between the familial and the chronic pancreatitis patients (P=0.181). The comparison among the 3 groups showed a significantly lower frequency of males in the familial pancreatitis patients (P=0.029).

The distribution of the ACE genotype is summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in allele distribution among the three groups (overall P=0.601); the ACE-D allele frequency in familial pancreatitis patients (49.0%) was not significantly different (P=0.395) in comparison to controls (55.8%), while the sporadic chronic pancreatitis patients had a 51.0% ACE-D allele frequency (P=0.820 and P=0.437 vs. familial pancreatitis and controls, respectively). Familial pancreatitis cases, chronic pancreatitis cases and controls had a similar ACE-DD genotype frequency (overall P=0.720 among the 3 groups): 27.5% (14/51), 27.9% (29/104), and 31.9% (52/163), respectively (Table 1).

table

The clinical features of patients with different ACE genotypes are summarized in Table 2. The mean age of the disease onset was 27.5±17.9 in familial pancreatitis cases and 39.4±14.6 in sporadic pancreatitis cases (P<0.001). There was a significantly lower frequency of both male sex (25.5% vs. 44.2%; P=0.022) and calcification (15.7% vs. 30.8%; P=0.037) in patients with familial pancreatitis in comparison to those with sporadic chronic pancreatitis, while no significant differences were detected between patients with ACE-DD and ACE II/ID genotypes (P<0.595, P=0.361, and P=0.640 for age of the disease onset, gender and calcification, respectively). Surgical intervention was reported in 12 of the 51 familial pancreatitis cases and in 19 of the 104 sporadic pancreatitis cases due to pancreatitis-related complications. Endocrine insufficiency was present in 3 familial pancreatitis cases of whom none had the ACE-DD genotype and 12 sporadic pancreatitis cases of whom two had the ACEDD genotype (Table 2). Ten out of 32 sporadic pancreatitis cases with pancreatic calcifications have ACE-DD genotype. None of the familial cases with the ACE-DD genotype had pancreatic calcification. Pancreatic duct abnormalities were reported in 28 sporadic and 11 familial cases. There was no significant relationship between the ACE genotype and pancreatic imaging findings (Table 2).

table

In sporadic chronic pancreatitis subjects, 44.8% of patients with the DD genotype reported severe pain attacks vs. 53.5% of patients with the ID or II genotype (13/29 DD vs. 40/75 II/ID). Those ratios were 57.1% and 48.6% (8/14 DD vs. 18/37 II/ID) in familial pancreatitis cases, respectively. The differences between the ratios were not significant (P=0.437 and P=0.589 in the sporadic chronic pancreatitis and the familial pancreatitis patients, respectively).

DISCUSSION

The RAS, traditionally known as an endocrine system regulating blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis [18], is also a mediator of normal and pathophysiological processes in a variety of tissues [19]. The ACE plays a central role in this system by converting angiotensin I to the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II [20]. Angiotensin II stimulates the proliferation of mesangial cells, cardiac fibroblasts, and hepatic stellate cells and increases the synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins [8, 9, 10, 21]. Thus, RAS is involved in the pathogenesis of fibrosis in tissues including kidney, heart and liver [7, 8, 9, 10]. The deletion type polymorphism in the 16th exon of the ACE gene is associated with elevated serum and cellular ACE levels. The ACE DD genotype is associated with several disorders including cardiac and renal diseases [12, 17] although the magnitude of this association has been questioned [22]. However, the pathological risk of ACE DD genotypes also varies between populations with different genetic and environmental backgrounds [23], suggesting that the ACE DD genotype is acting as a disease modifier rather than as a disease susceptibility factor.

The RAS system has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine functions [24]. During acute and chronic inflammation of the pancreas, both circulating ACE activity and intrinsic pancreatic ACE activity is markedly elevated [15, 25, 26]. Recently, Nagashio et al. reported that an ACE directs pancreatic fibrogenesis in experimental animals [27]. Moreover, the inhibition of the RAS with an ACE inhibitor attenuates pancreatic fibrosis in an animal model of chronic pancreatitis [16], suggesting that RAS might play an important role in pancreatic fibrosis. Therefore, we hypothesized that functional the ACE-I/D polymorphism might be a genetic risk factor for chronic pancreatitis This is the first report investigating a potential role of the ACE polymorphism in the susceptibility or progression of chronic pancreatitis. There are notable differences in the distributions of the ACE genotype within and between different populations [28, 29]. In our study, ACE gene I/D allele frequency is similar to previously reported frequencies in American populations [30]. In order to estimate the contribution of the ACE polymorphism to the course of chronic pancreatitis, the clinical signs and symptoms were compared between patients with different ACE genotypes. In contrast to the published studies in renal failure patients [31], the chronic pancreatitis phenotype did not differ between patients with ACE- DD, II or ID genotypes.

Although the RAS participates in the development and the progression of chronic pancreatitis and the inhibition of the ACE appears to improve outcome in some animal models, the functional ACE-DD polymorphism did not appear to influence the susceptibility or the course of chronic pancreatitis in our human study. Several possible explanations were considered: 1) the ACE DD genotype may influence the expression of the ACE in the heart and kidneys but not in the pancreas; 2) the ACE DD genotype may modify the progression of chronic pancreatitis, but this was not detected due to the insensitivity of phenotyping the rate of disease progression in chronic pancreatitis; 3) ACE DD genotypes are an important cofactor in a gene-gene or geneenvironment model which has not yet been resolved, or 4) other RAS-associated enzymes may be more important in the pancreas than the ACE within the pancreas (e.g. portions of the pathway may be bypassed and distal steps in the system activated by digestive enzymes such as trypsin [32]). However, the current results suggest that factors other than ACE expression levels may be important in regulating the RAS system within the pancreas. The fact that the RAS system specifically affects the pancreas also suggests that local, rather than systemic effects, are important in pancreatic diseases.

In conclusion, although the RAS system seems to play a role in the development of pancreatic inflammation and fibrosis, the ACE I/D polymorphism does not play a dominant role in the pathogenesis and the progression of chronic pancreatitis.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH Grant DK061451 (DCW) and by a scholarship from the Turkish Gastroenterology Association (NO)

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh