Total Pancreatectomy for Multifocal Primary Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report

Gopu Govindasamy

Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600001, India

Corresponding Author:
Gopu Govindasamy
Department of Surgical Oncology
Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital
Madras Medical College Chennai, Tamilnadu 600001, India
Tel: +917358290598
Fax: +914425305115
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 02nd, 2019; Accepted Date: December 23rd, 2019

 
Visit for more related articles at JOP. Journal of the Pancreas

Abstract

Total pancreatectomy was rarely performed dreaded by its post-operative complications and mortality. With the improved post-operative management of the exocrine and endocrine deficiencies ensuing the removal of entire pancreas, the surgery is now being performed more frequently for various indications. Here we describe the total pancreatectomy for a patient with multifocal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and the post-operative management of the patient. All patients become diabetic after total pancreatectomy and the control of blood sugar is really challenging due to extreme fluctuations in the levels. The exocrine deficiency is treated with pancreatic enzyme supplements; however, steatorrhoea, diarrhoea, weight loss, vitamin deficiencies, osteoporosis and osteopenia are still present even with effective management. Total pancreatectomy can still be performed safely with good post-operative outcomes in selected patients with specific indications.

Keywords

Pancreatectomy; diabetes; Endocrine; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Abbreviations

TP Total Pancreatectomy; IPMN Intra-Ductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms; MEN Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia; SMV Superior Mesenteric Vein; PV Polycythemia Vera; MRCP Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography; FBG Fasting Blood Glucose; PD Pancreatoduodenectomy; PDAC Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; NET Neuroendocrine Tumor

INTRODUCTION

Total Pancreatectomy (TP), an infrequently done surgery for pancreatic diseases, was first done in 1942 by Eugene Rockey of Portland, Oregon [1]. Historically, TP was considered a dreaded surgery due to its profound postoperative complications ensuing exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Later in the 1960s and 1970s, TP was then increasingly performed for various indications, firstly to abate the complications of anastomotic leak following Whipples Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and also for pancreatic cancers when it was considered that the high recurrence rates after partial resection was due to the multi-centric nature of the disease. Nevertheless, the interest in elective TP waned with a clearer understanding of the cancer biology, multidisciplinary approach to pancreatic cancers and advanced management of postoperative complications after partial pancreatectomy [2].

Over the decades the rates of TP have increased with the excellent medical management of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after TP. Today, more specific indications for TP have emerged including multifocal Intra-ductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), multifocal neuroendocrine tumours in the setting of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) syndrome, and multifocal pancreatic metastases most commonly from renal cell carcinoma and sometimes from melanoma, extensive pancreatic adenocarcinoma when R0 resection is not achieved with partial resection. It is also performed as an emergency procedure to alleviate sepsis due to pancreatic leak after partial resection [3].

Here we describe a case of multifocal pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent total pancreatectomy with splenectomy and the post-operative management of the patient.

CASE REPORT

A 67 year old male, a chronic smoker and alcoholic, presented with upper abdominal pain, dyspepsia, diabetes and features of obstructive jaundice. Complete blood investigations with renal and liver function tests with liver enzymes were done and found to be within normal limits except for poorly controlled blood sugar levels. He was treated with subcutaneous regular and long acting insulin and optimised for surgery. Multiphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography and MRCP were done which showed a mass lesion in the head of pancreas of size 2.9 × 2.9 cm and another lesion in the body of pancreas of size 1.3 × 1.1 cm. The second lesion was cystic lesion communicating with main pancreatic duct and IPMN was suspected. The head lesion was close to the SMV and SMV/PV confluence. The remaining pancreatic parenchyma was not normal with features of chronic pancreatitis. Hence total pancreatectomy was planned. Intra-operatively it was found that the lesion in the body of the pancreas was infiltrating the splenic vessels, hence splenectomy done and removed en bloc with the specimen. The intra-operative period was uneventful.

In the immediate post-operative period the patient was kept nil per orally and the blood sugar was monitored and insulin infusion was given with dextrose containing fluids, and 40 to 50 units of Insulin were given daily. After starting orals the insulin dose was titrated according to blood sugar levels. For blood glucose level <180 mgs no Insulin was given. For sugar levels of 180-220, 220-280, 280- 350 and >350 mgs, 4, 6, 8 and 10 units of regular insulin were respectively given subcutaneously between postoperative days 6 to 10. Later the patient was switched over to subcutaneous insulin injections thrice a day combining regular and long acting insulin given approximately in 2:1 ratio. The blood sugar levels in the first 15 days after surgery is shown in (Figure 1). The patient received pancreatic enzyme supplements 20,000 units thrice daily. The patient had multiple episodes of loose stools in the early post-operative period and gradually improved with the enzyme supplements with reduction in frequency and solid consistency of stools. There was no wound related morbidity. The patient recovered well and discharged on the 18th post-op day. The histopathology was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Figures 2, 3 and 4).

pancreas-blood-sugar-levels

Figure 1. Blood sugar levels in post-op day 1-15.

pancreas-multifocal-lesions

Figure 2. CECT showing multifocal lesions in head and body of pancreas (Bold arrow – mass in the head of pancreas, Light arrow – mass in the body).

pancreas-tumour-bed

Figure 3. post resection image showing tumour bed.

pancreas-pancreas-with-spleen

Figure 4. specimen with entire pancreas with spleen.

DISCUSSION

Surgeries for pancreatic malignancies include Whipples Pancreaticoduodenectomy, central pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy and total pancreatectomy with several modifications of these procedures. The treatment of pancreatic diseases has continuously evolved, moreover for malignant diseases, with the advent of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, more conservative procedures with good oncologic outcomes are advocated. Due to the improved results, today there are different and more specific indications than before for TP. Malignant tumors growing from the head into the left of pancreas, Pancreatic head cancer where it is not possible to achieve a tumor free resection margin with conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy or with dubious changes in the pancreatic main duct in frozen section, Recurrent cancer in the pancreatic remnant, Rescue pancreatectomy for a pancreatojejunostomy leak with sepsis or bleeding after a Whipple resection, Multifocal IPMN with potentially malignant foci present in all parts of the gland, Multiple metastases of renal cell carcinoma and melanoma, Multifocal neuroendocrine tumours in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia. However, TP is still not a commonly done surgery for pancreatic cancer; rate of TP compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy is in the range of 10% [4, 5, 6]. In the prospective observational study by Werner et al., the primary tumor was malignant in 377(87%) and benign in 53(13%) of cases, majority of malignant tumours were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=289, 76.7%), followed by IPMN (n=31, 8.2%) and NETs (n=23, 6.1%). Most of the benign tumours were IPMN (n=44, 77.2%) [3]. Similarly in a study by Ricardo et al. the majority of tumours were PDAC (52.1%) and IPMN (20.5%) [7].

The post-operative outcomes after TP are comparable to PD. In the study by Ricardo et al. comparing the outcomes of TP (n=73) and PD (n=184), there were no statistically significant differences in the overall mortality, morbidity, length of stay, reoperation rates and readmission rates. The mean overall survival for TP was 28 months (range 3-57 months) and 27 months for PD (range 18-36 months) and no significant difference was found. The survival for TP at 1, 3 and 5 years was 74, 48 and 31% and for PD was 78, 45, and 37%. The QoL was analysed for the two procedures with standard questionnaires which showed no significant difference [7]. Müller et al, in his study including 147 patients of TP for both elective and emergency indications, showed that the post-operative mortality and morbidity for elective TP was acceptable (mortality 4.8% and morbidity 36%), and also found that these were no significant differences in mortality and morbidity compared to partial pancreatic resections done during the same period [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].

The post-operative morbidity included delayed gastric emptying, SSI, sepsis, Intra-abdominal abscess, early anastomotic ulcer, biliary leak, haemorrhage, and pneumonia [11]. The post-operative morbidity in various series varied between 37%-62%. The re-operation rates ranged from 3-17% [14, 15]. There were no statistically significant differences when compared to the PD [9]. The morbidity reported in various studies are listed in (Table 1).

image

All patients become diabetic after TP due to total loss of endocrine function of the pancreas, new onset diabetes after PD range from 18-39%. The insulin deficient state after TP has been termed “Brittle Diabetes” (Pancreatogenic diabetes or Type-3c DM), due to wide range of fluctuations in the blood sugar level which is excessive and unpredictable. The increase in both insulin sensitivity and Insulin binding capacity of RBCs can lead to severe hypoglycemia. Furthermore, the counter regulatory hormone Glucagon is also deficient leading to unopposed action of insulin and severe hypoglycaemia even with marginally excess dose of insulin [11]. Diabetic ketoacidosis is rare in these patients unlike in those with Type-2 DM. Insulin is given as continuous infusion along with dextrose containing fluids in the early post-operative period. Later combinations of rapid and long acting insulins are given through sub-cutaneous injections [13]. Insulin can also be delivered through Insulin pumps/ continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Recently, treatments with long acting insulin preparations and specialized nurse led diabetic management have shown improved outcomes [14, 15]. The HbA1c levels can be maintained in an acceptable range with effective insulin treatment. The median HbA1c levels reported in various series are shown in (Table 2).

image

Pancreatic exocrine deficiency causes impairment of fat digestion and leads to fat malabsorption, diarrhea, steatorrhea, weight loss and hepatic steatosis. These contribute to deficiency of fat soluble vitamins (A,D,E,K), magnesium and trace elements, leading to malnutrition related complications like osteopathy and osteoporosis [16]. Treatment with pancreatic enzyme supplements and nutritional interventions such as low fat diet can improve the symptoms related to malnutrition. The standard pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is 40,000 – 50,000 units of lipase per day (range 25,000-450,000) [17, 18].

Patient education regarding the management of postoperative diabetes and enzyme deficiency is of prime importance. Pre-operatively, the patients should be referred to an endocrinologist and advice regarding postoperative use of insulin formulations and management of diabetes should be given.

In a retrospective study evaluating the correlation between post-operative nutritional status and the complications, it was found that higher early postoperative FBG levels and low early serum pre-albumin levels were significantly associated with increased rates of complications after TP. Post-operative HbA1c levels >7% was associated with decreased recurrence-free survival and was an independent risk factor for tumour recurrence [19, 20]. Hence, good glycaemic control and nutritional status is important in achieving optimal outcomes and good QoL after TP.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, TP is a feasible surgery with acceptable mortality and morbidity and long term outcomes. The management of post-operative complications, especially exocrine and endocrine insufficiency still poses a challenge to the treating physician. However, optimal insulin therapy, patient education, pancreatic enzyme supplements, change in food habits all contribute to the maintaining quality of life after TP.

Conflicts of Interest

All named authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Recommended Conferences
Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh